tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9772337.post6177529795032624073..comments2023-04-27T10:40:21.945+01:00Comments on Thought Chronicles: Why are we not on the Shanghai JiaoTong list?Shawn Tanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04342111805045331752noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9772337.post-79412651777804478862007-08-12T17:20:00.000+01:002007-08-12T17:20:00.000+01:00I read those posts before. New readers might just ...I read those posts before. New readers might just go:" Ha?"koln_auhchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14543178439593157930noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9772337.post-39659591403120989382007-08-12T16:51:00.000+01:002007-08-12T16:51:00.000+01:001) Yep, rankings are flawed. The fact that they us...1) Yep, rankings are flawed. The fact that they used Nature & Science only, is biased! The best E&E research goes into IEEE!<BR/><BR/>2) Yea, the DAP should put together a small working group/committee to come up with some suggestions on how to overhaul our education, working within the budget of the current RM..<BR/><BR/>3) Search around my blog archives..Shawn Tanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04342111805045331752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9772337.post-38956970567680436282007-08-12T15:53:00.000+01:002007-08-12T15:53:00.000+01:00Politics aside, I still think that most people do...Politics aside, I still think that most people do not grill the rankings thoroughly. The indicators used to gauge the rankings are more likely to affect [b]post-grad students[/b], IMO, instead of undergraduates. <BR/><BR/>(As you said, based on research, not teaching)<BR/><BR/>I feel that the reliability of the ranking depends on how far you want to generalise it. If you ignore the methodology,koln_auhchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14543178439593157930noreply@blogger.com